Volcano misinformation gets tricky with AI
- Dr Janine Krippner
Misinformation is not new. Sometimes confusion reigns and wrong information is innocently shared. Sometimes tabloids make clickbait headlines that are wildly misleading, so you visit their website and they make money. Now we also have people on social media posting misinformation for likes in stressful and even dangerous situations.
I am
following the situation around Santorini, where there is real danger to people experiencing
frequent earthquakes. This is a situation that is truly impacting communities
and there is the possibility that something worse may happen, like a larger, more
damaging earthquake.
Now that we
have AI and much more convincing fake videos to contend with, we must be even
more cautious and sceptical, especially if we are viewing something on social
media. So how can we tell?
Firstly,
who is the source? Is it a trustworthy agency who checks facts? Is it an expert
or trusted local? Or someone who tends to post a lot of dramatic videos for
likes with captions containing all caps and hyped-up language? There seems to
be a race to be the first to post about an eruption these days. The desperation
to go viral might have something to do with it?
![]() |
An AI generated video shared by EuroNews in an article pointing out the use of fake videos of an eruption at Santorini. |
Does
something seem off about the video? Is the colouring wrong? Does something
about the physics, like water behaviour, seem a bit weird? Is the colouring
saturated or a bit unrealistic? If there are people, is their behaviour odd?
Are features blurred? AI generated images can get things wrong, like adding the
wrong number of fingers. Are people responding as you would expect them to during
an eruption?
There is a
term ‘uncanny valley’ that refers to feeling ‘off’ when looking at something
that isn’t quite real. Go with your gut and check again.
Looking at
the landscape is important. Santorini is a very recognisable island with steep
slopes and the classic white buildings. Some people have shared a video of
Whakaari with a gas plume. Assuming the total lack of buildings on the island
aren’t obviously pointing to the wrong volcano. EuroNews used reverse image
search to identify our backyard volcano was standing in as a fake.
I’ve even
seen an old computer-generated simulation of an Auckland volcanic field
eruption shared with claims of It depicting past eruptions at other volcanoes
in very different landscapes. That was made back when it was obviously not
real… if you take the time to look.
![]() |
A screenshot of a simulation video of an eruption within the Auckland Volcanic Field, which has been online since around 2011. A great learning tool, sometimes wrongly used to show other volcanoes during a crisis. By the Auckland War Memorial Museum. Full video. |
What else is in the image or video? Is everything to scale? Make sure there isn’t any strange blurring between objects, or any areas that look too smooth or air brushed.
Is there
any text? There might be repetition of words or bad spelling if there is.
Sometimes
it just takes slowing down and taking a few seconds before sharing something
online, but it is getting trickier. We can point out when something isn’t right
in the comments so that others can see it too.
In
hazardous situations we all have a role to play in making sure we are sharing
good information. We might be on the other side of the world, but people
being impacted by these events can see what’s posted online and this can cause
very real distress.